Examining conflict between components of attitudes: Ambivalence and inconsistency are distinct constructs.
- 1 January 2000
- journal article
- retracted article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement
- Vol. 32 (1) , 58-70
- https://doi.org/10.1037/h0087101
Abstract
Past research has indicated that attitudes can be based on different types of psychological information or components, such as emotions and beliefs. It has also been suggested that the amount of ambivalence and inconsistency between and within these components are important aspects of attitude structure. In this paper, we discuss the relation between ambivalence and inconsistency, and their effects on message processing. Based on past theorizing and research, and on our reanalyses of previous data (Maio, Bell, & Esses, 1996), we conclude that ambivalence and inconsistency are distinct constructs, which are empirically unrelated and produce different effects on message processing.This publication has 2 references indexed in Scilit:
- The gradual threshold model of ambivalence: Relating the positive and negative bases of attitudes to subjective ambivalence.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1996
- Relation of implicit theories to the construction of personal histories.Psychological Review, 1989