Classifying Recommendations for Clinical Practice Guidelines
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 1 September 2004
- journal article
- Published by American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) in Pediatrics
- Vol. 114 (3) , 874-877
- https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2004-1260
Abstract
Clinical practice guidelines are intended to improve the quality of clinical care by reducing inappropriate variations, producing optimal outcomes for patients, minimizing harm, and promoting cost-effective practices. This statement proposes an explicit classification of recommendations for clinical practice guidelines of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) to promote communication among guideline developers, implementers, and other users of guideline knowledge, to improve consistency, and to facilitate user understanding. The statement describes 3 sequential activities in developing evidence-based clinical practice guidelines and related policies: 1) determination of the aggregate evidence quality in support of a proposed recommendation; 2) evaluation of the anticipated balance between benefits and harms when the recommendation is carried out; and 3) designation of recommendation strength. An individual policy can be reported as a “strong recommendation,” “recommendation,” “option,” or “no recommendation.” Use of this classification is intended to improve consistency and increase the transparency of the guideline-development process, facilitate understanding of AAP clinical practice guidelines, and enhance both the utility and credibility of AAP clinical practice guidelines.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD InitiativeAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2003
- Assessing “Best Evidence”: Issues in Grading the Quality of Studies for Systematic ReviewsThe Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement, 1999
- Dope Fiend to Drug AddictJAMA, 1972
- Corticosteroids in CroupPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1972