The SF36 Version 2: critical analyses of population weights, scoring algorithms and population norms
Top Cited Papers
- 1 February 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Quality of Life Research
- Vol. 16 (4) , 661-673
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-006-9154-4
Abstract
The SF36 Version 2 (SF36V2) is a revision of the SF36 Version 1, and is a widely used health status measure. It is important that guidelines for interpreting scores are available. A population sample of Australians (n = 3015) weighted to achieve representativeness was administered the SF36V2. Comparisons between published US weights and sample derived weights were made, and Australian population norms computed and presented. Significant differences were observed on 7/8 scales and on the mental health summary scale. Possible causes of these findings may include different sampling and data collection procedures, demographic characteristics, differences in data collection time (1998 vs. 2004), differences in health status or differences in cultural perception of the meaning of health. Australian population norms by age cohort, gender and health status are reported by T-score as recommended by the instrument developers. Additionally, the proportions of cases within T-score deciles are presented and show there are important data distribution issues. The procedures reported here may be used by other researchers where local effects are suspected. The population norms presented may be of interest. There are statistical artefacts associated with T-scores that have implications for how SF36V2 data are analysed and interpreted.Keywords
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Die Version 2.0 des SF-36 Health Survey - Ergebnisse einer bevölkerungsrepräsentativen StudieInternational Journal of Public Health, 2005
- US Valuation of the EQ-5D Health StatesMedical Care, 2005
- Valuation of Health States in the US versus the UK: Two Measures Divided by a Common Language?Medical Care, 2005
- The Equivalence of SF-36 Summary Health Scores Estimated Using Standard and Country-Specific Algorithms in 10 CountriesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1998
- An Approach to Response Scale Development for Cross-Cultural QuestionnairesEuropean Psychologist, 1997
- Evaluating the efficacy of medical treatment: Possibilities and limitationsSocial Science & Medicine, 1995
- The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): Position paper from the World Health OrganizationSocial Science & Medicine, 1995
- The SF-36 Health Survey Questionnaire: Is it Suitable for use with Older Adults?Age and Ageing, 1995
- The short form 36 health status questionnaire: clues from the Oxford region's normative data about its usefulness in measuring health gain in population surveys.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1995
- How to Measure in EducationThe American Journal of Psychology, 1923