Prognostic Value of Metabolic Tumor Volume Measured by 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography in Patients with Esophageal Carcinoma
- 14 October 2009
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Annals of Surgical Oncology
- Vol. 17 (1) , 115-122
- https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-009-0719-7
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of metabolic tumor volume (MTV) measured by (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ((18)F-FDG PET) in patients with esophageal carcinoma. We retrospectively reviewed 151 patients with pathologically proven esophageal carcinoma (146 squamous cell carcinomas and 5 adenocarcinomas) who underwent pretreatment (18)F-FDG PET. MTV and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) for the primary tumors were measured by (18)F-FDG PET. The prognostic significance of MTV, SUVmax, and other clinicopathological variables was assessed by Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. To further evaluate and compare the predictive performance of PET parameters, MTV and SUVmax, time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was used. In the univariate analysis, age, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage, tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) factors, MTV, and SUVmax of primary tumor were significant predictors of survival. On multivariate analysis adjusted for age, sex, and treatment modality, independent predictive factors associated with decreased overall survival were T stage [hazard ratio (HR) 4.325, P = 0.006], M stage (HR 2.009, P = 0.007), and MTV (HR 1.013, P = 0.021). SUVmax was not a significant factor (HR 0.97, P = 0.061). On time-dependent ROC analysis, MTV showed good predictive performance for overall survival consistently better than SUVmax. MTV, a volumetric parameter of (18)F-FDG PET, is an important independent prognostic factor for survival and a better predictor of survival than SUVmax for the primary tumor in patients with esophageal carcinoma.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cancer Statistics, 2008CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2008
- Metabolic Tumor Burden Predicts for Disease Progression and Death in Lung CancerInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2007
- American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System Does Not Accurately Predict Survival in Patients Receiving Multimodality Therapy for Esophageal AdenocarcinomaJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2007
- The prognostic importance of the number of involved lymph nodes in esophageal cancer: Implications for revisions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging systemThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2006
- Prognostic Significance of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Expression and Microvessel Density in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Comparison With Positron Emission TomographyAnnals of Surgical Oncology, 2006
- Prognostic factors for survival in stage III non–small-cell lung cancer treated with definitive radiation therapy: Impact of tumor volumeInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2006
- Value of baseline positron emission tomography for predicting overall survival in patient with nonmetastatic esophageal or gastroesophageal junction carcinomaCancer, 2005
- Better prediction of prognosis for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma using primary tumor volumeCancer, 2004
- Prognostic factors for the survival of patients with esophageal carcinoma in the U.S.Cancer, 2002
- Measurement of tumor volume by PET to evaluate prognosis in patients with advanced cervical cancer treated by radiation therapyInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2002