Race, resource use, and survival in seriously III hospitalized adults
- 1 July 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of General Internal Medicine
- Vol. 11 (7) , 387-396
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02600183
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between patient race and hospital resource use. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Five geographically diverse teaching hospitals. PATIENTS: Patients were 9,105 hospitalized adults with one of nine illnesses associated with an average 6-month mortality of 50%. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Measures of resource use included: a modified version of the Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (TISS); performance of any of any of five procedures (operation, dialysis, pulmonary artery catheterization, endoscopy, and bronchoscopy); and hospital charges, adjusted by the Medicare cost-to-charge ratio per cost center at each participating hospital. The median patient age was 65; 79% were white, 16% African-American, 3% Hispanic, and 2% other races; 47% died within 6 months. After adjusting for other sociodemographic factors, severity of illness, functional status, and study site, African-Americans were less likely to receive any of five procedures on study day 1 and 3 (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60, 0.81). In addition, African-Americans had lower TISS scores on study day 1 and 3 (OR −1.8; 95% CI −1.3, −2.4) and lower estimated costs of hospitalization (OR −$2,805; 95% CI −$1,672, −$3,883). Results were similar after adjustment for patients’ preferences and physicians’ prognostic estimates. Differences in resource use were less marked after adjusting for the specialty of the attending physician but remained significant. In a subset analysis, cardiologists were less likely to care for African-Americans with congestive heart failure (p<.001), and cardiologists used more resources (p<.001). After adjustment for other sociodemographic factors, severity of illness, functional status, and study site, survival was slightly better for African-American patients (hazard ratio 0.91; 95% CI 0.84, 0.98) than for white or other race patients. CONCLUSIONS: Seriously ill African-Americans received less resource-intensive care than other patients after adjustment for other sociodemographic factors and for severity of illness. Some of these differences may be due to differential use of subspecialists. The observed differences in resource use were not associated with a survival advantage for white or other race patients.Keywords
This publication has 54 references indexed in Scilit:
- An International Randomized Trial Comparing Four Thrombolytic Strategies for Acute Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Severity of illness and resource use differences among white and black hospitalized elderlyArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1992
- A brief self-administered questionnaire to determine functional capacity (The Duke Activity Status Index)Published by Elsevier ,1989
- Access to medical care for black and white Americans. A matter of continuing concernJAMA, 1989
- Racial inequalities in the use of procedures for patients with ischemic heart disease in MassachusettsJAMA, 1989
- APACHE IICritical Care Medicine, 1985
- Ambulatory Medical CareNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980
- The Effect of Medical Training Factors on Physician Utilization BehaviorMedical Care, 1977
- Estimation of the probability of an event as a function of several independent variablesBiometrika, 1967
- Studies of Illness in the AgedJAMA, 1963