Organization of projections from olfactory epithelium to olfactory bulb in the frog, Rana pipiens
- 15 September 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Comparative Neurology
- Vol. 299 (3) , 299-311
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.902990304
Abstract
One hypothesis for the coding of olfactory quality is that regions of the olfactory epithelium are differentially sensitive to particular odor qualities and that this regional sensitivity is conveyed to the olfactory bulb in a topographic manner by the olfactory nerve. A corollary to this hypothesis is that there is a sufficiently orderly connection between the epithelium and the olfactory bulb to convey this topographical coding. Thus we examined topography in the projection from epithelium to bulb in the frog, which has been the subject of numerous electrophysiological studies but has not yet been examined using modern neuroanatomical techniques. The tracer WGA-HRP was applied to the ventral or to the dorsal olfactory epithelium, or both. Anterograde transport of label to the olfactory bulb was seen after as few as 2 days; label was still present in the bulb as long as 21 days postinjection. In cases where WGA-HRP was applied to the entire epithelium, there was dense anterograde labelling of the ipsilateral olfactory bulb. In addition, a small medial portion of the contralateral bulb was labelled. Injections limited to either the ventral or dorsal epithelium produced patterns of anterograde labelling in the glomerular layer of the olfactory bulb, which varied with the size and location of the injection. With very large injections in either the dorsal or ventral epithelium, label appeared to be evenly distributed in the glomerular layer. With smaller injections in the ventral epithelium, there was heavier labelling in the lateral than in the medial portions of the glomerular layer, although light labelling was found in all regions of the glomerular layer. In contrast, injection sites restricted to the dorsal epithelium produced more anterograde labelling in the medial than lateral portions of the glomerular layer. These patterns extended throughout the dorsal-ventral extent of the bulb. Within the limits of the anterograde tracing technique used, we were unable to detect any systematic relationship between the pattern of labelling in the glomerular layer and the medial-lateral or rostral-caudal location of the injection site in either the ventral or dorsal epithelium. We conclude that in the frog, as in other amphibia, there is only a limited degree of topographic order between the epithelium and the olfactory bulb.Keywords
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ontogenesis of the functional activity of guinea-pig olfactory bulb: Autoradiographic study with the 2-deoxyglucose methodDevelopmental Brain Research, 1983
- Investigations of the discriminative properties of the frog's olfactory mucosa using a photoactivable odorantNeuroscience Letters, 1983
- Ontogenesis of the functional activity of rat olfactory bulb: Autoradiographic study with the 2-deoxyglucose methodDevelopmental Brain Research, 1981
- Olfactory receptor cell staining using horseradish peroxidaseThe Anatomical Record, 1981
- Receptive fields of second-order neurons in the olfactory bulb of the hamster.The Journal of general physiology, 1980
- Spatial Distribution of the EOG in the Rat; a Variation with Odour QualityActa Physiologica Scandinavica, 1977
- Electrophysiological evidence for a topographical projection of the nasal mucosa onto the olfactory bulb of the frog.The Journal of general physiology, 1976
- Distribution of butanol molecules along bullfrog olfactory mucosaNature, 1975
- ODOR DISCRIMINATION BY FROG OLFACTORY RECEPTORSChemical Senses, 1974
- Spatial Distribution of Receptor-Responses to Stimulation with Different OdoursActa Physiologica Scandinavica, 1971