Comparison of the surface structure, metal binding, and fecal coliform recoveries of nine membrane filters
- 1 July 1977
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Vol. 34 (1) , 69-79
- https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.34.1.69-79.1977
Abstract
A comparative study was made of nine commonly used membrane filters from five manufacturers, all recommended for enumeration of coliform bacteria. Bacterial recoveries and flow rates were examined from three types of water and were found to correlate with the surface pore structure determined by scanning electron microscopy. The sorption of metals was also determined. The results of these studies indicate that the five best membranes for fecal coliform recovery could be placed in two groups: Millipore HC and Gelman, followed by Johns-Manville SG and AG and Sartorius 13806.This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluation of millipore HA and HC membrane filters for the enumeration of indicator bacteriaApplied and Environmental Microbiology, 1976
- Influence of coliform source on evaluation of membrane filters.1975
- Optimum membrane structures for growth of coliform and fecal coliform organisms.1975
- Comparison of the new millipore HC with conventional membrane filters for the enumeration of fecal coliform bacteria.1975
- Statistical analysis of the recovery of coliform organisms on Gelman and Millipore membrane filters.1974
- Comparison of autoclave and ethylene oxide-sterilized membrane filters used in water quality studies.1974
- Comparison of Gelman and Millipore membrane filters for enumerating fecal coliform bacteria.1973