Phylogenyvsreticulation in prehistory
- 1 September 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Vol. 70 (270) , 881-890
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003598x00084131
Abstract
Two pure and opposing models exist to give historical account of the structure in modern cultural patterns. A phylogenetic account explores divergence from some shared commonality (the word ‘phylogenetic’ is from the Greek words for ‘tribal origins’). A reticulate account concentrates on a network of interactions (the word ‘reticulate’ comes via French from the Latin for ‘small net’). It follows that neither model may tell all the story. These continuing issues are explored with particular attention to the relations between histories as they are inferred from archaeological and from linguistic patterns.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- The End of a ParadigmThe History and Geography of Human Genes.L. Luca Cavalli-Sforza , Paolo Menozzi , Alberto PiazzaCurrent Anthropology, 1995
- Indo‐European origins: A computer‐simulation test of five hypothesesAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1995
- An Archaeologist's View of Language Macrofamily RelationshipsOceanic Linguistics, 1994
- Reply to Moore and RomneyAmerican Anthropologist, 1994
- Archaeology, Genetics and Linguistic DiversityMan, 1992
- World languages and human dispersals: a minimalist viewPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1992
- The Austronesian Dispersal and the Origin of LanguagesScientific American, 1991
- Speaking of Forked Tongues: The Feasibility of Reconciling Human Phylogeny and the History of Language [and Comments]Current Anthropology, 1990
- Early oceanic linguistic prehistory:A Reassessment∗The Journal of Pacific History, 1989
- The Evolution of Ethnicity among the Acholi of Uganda: The Precolonial PhaseEthnohistory, 1989