A Prospective Study of the Value of Conventional CT, Dynamic CT, Ultrasonography and Arteriography for Staging Renal Carcinoma
- 1 September 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Urology
- Vol. 64 (3) , 209-217
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.1989.tb05999.x
Abstract
Summary— The value of dynamic CT scanning for staging renal carcinoma was studied prospectively in 28 patients and the results compared with those of ultrasonography, arteriography and conventional CT. Arteriography correctly staged 48% of tumours; ultrasonography and conventional CT correctly staged 50% and dynamic CT correctly staged 72%. Dynamic CT staged renal carcinoma more accurately than ultrasonography, conventional CT or arteriography and it is suggested that arteriography should be restricted to specific indications such as the mapping of arterial anatomy and therapeutic renal artery embolisation.This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis and staging of renal masses: a critical appraisal and comparison with computed tomographyWorld Journal of Urology, 1988
- Caval extension of renal cell carcinoma Results of surgical treatmentUrology, 1987
- Renal Carcinoma: a Ten‐year Review 1971–1980British Journal of Urology, 1987
- The Accuracy and Limitations of Ultrasound in the Assessment of Venous Extension in Renal CarcinomaBritish Journal of Urology, 1987
- Renal cell carcinoma: Survival and prognostic factorsUrology, 1986
- THE DIAGNOSIS AND LOCAL STAGING OF RENAL CANCER — AN APPRAISALAnz Journal of Surgery, 1984
- Computerized tomography versus angiography in the staging of malignant renal neoplasmThe British Journal of Radiology, 1981
- Computed tomography staging of renal carcinomaUrologic Radiology, 1980
- Comparison of computed tomography and ultrasound in abdominal staging of renal cancerUrology, 1980
- Primer on Certain Elements of Medical Decision MakingNew England Journal of Medicine, 1975