The Japanese Corporate Network: A Blockmodel Analysis
- 1 March 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by JSTOR in Administrative Science Quarterly
- Vol. 37 (1) , 105-139
- https://doi.org/10.2307/2393535
Abstract
Japanese intercorporate relationships are considered in terms of three different structures of interaction: corporate groupings, financial centrality, and industrial interdependency. The significance of each of these structures is tested with a sample of the forty largest industrial firms and twenty largest financial firms in Japan across networks of equity ownership, interlocking directorships, and banking borrowing. Macro-network blockmodeling analysis demonstrates that financial hierarchy is a pervasive pattern for all sets of relationships, and the position of industrial firms in the network is largely determined by corporate group membership (i.e., keiretsu). However, in contrast to predictions that financial centrality and corporate groupings will be used to manage industrial interdependencies among closely related firms, the results suggest that industrial firms with similar network positions represent highly diversified market sectors. These findings together provide a relatively finely detailed picture of the sources of network structure in Japan, variations that exist among different intercorporate network variables, the role of financial institutions in the Japanese economy, and the hierarchical nature of Japanese corporate groupings.This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Patterns of Inter-Firm Control in Japanese Business*Organization Studies, 1989
- Manufacturer-supplier relationships in Japan and the concept of relation-specific skillJournal of the Japanese and International Economies, 1989
- Directorship Interlocks and Corporate ProfitabilityAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1987
- The Ties That Bind: Organizational and Class Bases of Stability in a Corporate Interlock NetworkAmerican Sociological Review, 1986
- Interlocking Directorates in Canada: Intercorporate or Class Alliance?Administrative Science Quarterly, 1984
- The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational FieldsAmerican Sociological Review, 1983
- Broken Ties: Interlocking Directorates and Intercorporate CoordinationAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1983
- Centrality in Corporate Interlock Networks: Reliability and StabilityAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1982
- Interlocking Directorates and Interest Group FormationAmerican Sociological Review, 1981
- Structural equivalence of individuals in social networksThe Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1971