Do Competing Specialists and Preferencing Dealers Affect Market Quality?
- 1 October 1997
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Review of Financial Studies
- Vol. 10 (4) , 969-993
- https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/10.4.969
Abstract
We empirically demonstrate that the opportunities the Boston Stock Exchange and the Cincinnati Stock Exchange offer members to take the other side of their customers’ orders through affiliated market makers (to internalize orders) have little short-run effect on posted or effective bid-ask spreads. This is true despite substantial movement of order flow away from the New York Stock Exchange when trading under one of these regional stock exchange programs begins. These results contrast with the adverse effects of market fragmentation and internalization predicted by some theoretical market microstructure analyses and the popular financial press.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Price, trade size, and information in securities marketsPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- Quotes, Order Flow, and Price DiscoveryThe Journal of Finance, 1997
- The Degree of Price Resolution and Equity Trading CostsSSRN Electronic Journal, 1996
- Market Making, the Tick Size, and Payment-for-Order Flow: Theory and EvidenceThe Journal of Business, 1995
- Posted versus effective spreads: Good prices or bad quotes?Journal of Financial Economics, 1994
- Market Structures and Liquidity: A Transactions Data Study of Exchange ListingsJournal of Financial Intermediation, 1994
- Market Integration and Price Execution for NYSE-Listed SecuritiesThe Journal of Finance, 1993
- An Analysis of Intraday Patterns in Bid/Ask Spreads for NYSE StocksThe Journal of Finance, 1992
- Differences in Execution Prices Among the NYSE, the Regionals, and the NASDSSRN Electronic Journal, 1991
- An Empirical Study of the Effect of Rule 19c-3The Journal of Law and Economics, 1990