Toward Applicable Social Choice Theory: A Comparison of Social Choice Functions under Spatial Model Assumptions
- 1 December 1978
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Political Science Review
- Vol. 72 (4) , 1341-1356
- https://doi.org/10.2307/1954543
Abstract
This article develops a formal framework to aid political designers in the comparison of social choice functions. It generalizes earlier assumptions of “impartial culture” so that we may begin to investigate the effect of politically interesting variations on the probability that different social choice functions will satisfy given performance criteria. As an application of the framework, a detailed Monte Carlo study compares the ability of four different social choice functions to select a Condorcet winner when voter preference orders have been generated from a spatial representation of ideal points and alternatives. We also investigate the potential of alternative methods of selecting winners in presidential primary elections.Keywords
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Method of Scaling with Applications to the 1968 and 1972 Presidential ElectionsAmerican Political Science Review, 1977
- The voter's paradox and the homogeneity of individual preference ordersPublic Choice, 1976
- Voting methods: A simulationPublic Choice, 1976
- The impact of decision rules in multi-candidate campaignsPublic Choice, 1976
- An analysis of simple two-stage voting systemsBehavioral Science, 1976
- Candidate support functions in the 1968 electionPublic Choice, 1975
- Simple voting systems and majority ruleBehavioral Science, 1974
- Voter concordance, simple majorities, and group decision methodsBehavioral Science, 1973
- The occurrence of the paradox of voting in University electionsPublic Choice, 1970
- Graph-theoretic approaches to the theory of social choicePublic Choice, 1968