Landcare in Australia: Burned out and browned off
- 19 August 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Local Environment
- Vol. 6 (3) , 311-326
- https://doi.org/10.1080/13549830120073293
Abstract
Australia has relied heavily on voluntary approaches to managing critical natural resource issues. Community Landcare groups are an important element of this strategy and have been widely acclaimed as an Australian success story. Landcare group activity has mobilised a large cross-section of the rural community and contributed to improved resource management. These volunteer groups are now an important delivery mechanism for on-the-ground work funded through large government programmes, including the billion dollar Natural Heritage Trust. At the same time, research reported in this paper suggests that government cuts to extension staff supporting Landcare and ongoing management issues are contributing to burn-out of group members and are undermining group effectiveness. Australia may be nearing the limits of voluntary approaches to natural resource management. At the very least, there needs to be more coherent, professional management of Landcare. Australia ha contado fuertemente con enfoques voluntarios para el manejo de temas críticos del recurso natural. Grupos Comunitarios de cuidado de tierras son elementos importantes de esta estrategia y han sido ampliamente aclamados como una historia de exito Australiana. La actividad del grupo de cuidado de tierras ha mobilizado un gran sector de la comunidad rural y ha contribuido a la mejora del manejo de recursos. Estos grupos voluntarios son ahora un importante mecanismo de reparto para trabajo de tierra financiado por grandes programas de gobierno incluyendo el Fondo de Herencia Natural del billon de dólares. Al mismo tiempo, la investigación descrita en este documento sugiere que recortes del gobierno al personal que apoya el cuidado de Tierras y temas de manejo en curso estan contribuyendo al desgaste de los miembros del grupo y socavando la efectividad del grupo. Australia puede estar acercandose a los límites de enfoques voluntarios al manejo de los recursos naturales. Por lo menos, se necesita una manejo mas profesional y coherente del Cuidado de la Tierra.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Landcare: Approaching the Limits of Voluntary ActionAustralasian Journal of Environmental Management, 2000
- Landcare and Catchment Management in Australia: Lessons for State-Sponsored Community ParticipationSociety & Natural Resources, 2000
- Agency–Community Partnership in Landcare: Lessons for State-Sponsored Citizen Resource ManagementEnvironmental Management, 1998
- Landcare, Stewardship and Sustainable Agriculture in AustraliaEnvironmental Values, 1998
- Landcare in Australia: Does it Make a Difference?Journal of Environmental Management, 1996
- Tumby Bay – An Integrated Community Development Approach for Managing ChangeRural Society, 1996
- Community participation in Landcare policy in Australia: The Victorian experience with regional Landcare plansSociety & Natural Resources, 1995
- Landcare - Before the FloodRural Society, 1992
- EditorialRural Society, 1992
- Agricultural Production and Environmental Degradation in the Murray-Darling BasinPublished by Springer Nature ,1992