Motor Programming Is Not the Only Process Which Can Influence RT
- 1 December 1981
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Motor Behavior
- Vol. 13 (4) , 320-328
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.1981.10735257
Abstract
The current status of research on the memory drum theory is evaluated with emphasis on the issues raised by Marteniuk and MacKenzie (1981). A general theme emerging from this review is that response programming is not the only process which can influence RT and that distinguishing programming from non-programming effects clarifies rather than “clouds„ the issues.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Temporal compatibility in dual motor tasks II: Simultaneous articulation and hand movementsMemory & Cognition, 1981
- Relative contribution of movement time, amplitude, and velocity to response initiation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1980
- Use of Simple Reaction Time in Motor Programming StudiesJournal of Motor Behavior, 1980
- Is Reaction Time Different for Long and Short Response Durations in Simple and Choice Conditions?Journal of Motor Behavior, 1979
- Doing two things at once: The role of temporal compatibilityMemory & Cognition, 1979
- Programmed control of aimed movements revisited: The role of target visibility and symmetry.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1979
- Short-term memory as a response preparation stateMemory & Cognition, 1976
- Feedback versus motor programming in the control of aimed movements.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1975
- Implicit speech in reading: Reconsidered.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973
- Implicit speech: Mechanism in perceptual encoding?Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970