Three principles of Serendip: insight, chance, and discovery in qualitative research
- 1 October 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education
- Vol. 9 (4) , 434-447
- https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839960090405
Abstract
This article discusses the role of serendipity in qualitative research. Drawing on ideas and methodological suggestions from a set of classic and recent fieldwork accounts, the authors examine conceptions of serendipity and the ways that these conceptions become embedded in the processes by which we incorporate and embrace the temporal, relational, and analytical aspects of serendipity. The authors reject the perspective that it is the divine roll of the dice that determines serendipity and argue that serendipity is the interactive outcome of unique and contingent “mixes” of insight coupled with chance. A wide range of attempts to make sense of serendipity in sociology and anthropology are provided as exemplars of how planned insights coupled with unplanned events can potentially yield meaningful and interesting discovery in qualitative research.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- “Foi Por Acaso”: Conceptualizing CoincidenceThe Sociological Quarterly, 1994
- Chance in Human AffairsSociological Theory, 1994
- In Defense of Street Corner SocietyJournal of Contemporary Ethnography, 1992
- Street Corner SocietyJournal of Contemporary Ethnography, 1992
- Boelen may know Holland, Boelen may know Barzini, but Boelen “Doesn't know Diddle about the North End!”Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 1992
- Corrigendum: Methodology, Technology and SerendipitySocial Psychology Quarterly, 1987
- Family ScholarshipJournal of Family Issues, 1984
- Toward an Ethnographic LanguageAmerican Anthropologist, 1982
- That's Interesting!Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 1971
- A Measurement of Excess Antenna Temperature at 4080 Mc/s.The Astrophysical Journal, 1965