Prioritization of chemical carcinogenesis testing: the use of production data
- 1 June 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Civil Engineering Systems
- Vol. 2 (2) , 84-96
- https://doi.org/10.1080/02630258508970387
Abstract
Based on previous work, this paper aims to show how approximate methods of estimating exposure can lead to a preliminary ranked list of chemicals for regulation of carcinogens. This list is likely to be more reliable, than those so far generated. The paper argues four main points. Firstly that an indication of the route by which the total production of a hazardous material is distributed and enters the human body should be explicitly included in calculations. Second, simple calculations based on conservative bounds should be made to establish a ranking or set of priorities for regulation. Third, an improved system for establishing regulatory priorities can be based on formal analysis using regret functions. Finally some simple, bounded, calculations based on commonly used herbicides and pesticides are made and it is shown how some regulatory processes could be modified.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Use of Acute Toxicity to Estimate Carcinogenic RiskRisk Analysis, 1984
- Cost-Effective Priorities for Cancer PreventionScience, 1983
- Ranking Animal Carcinogens: A Proposed Regulatory ApproachScience, 1981
- Is Risk Assessment A Science?Risk Analysis, 1981
- Risk/benefit analysis for toxic chemicalsEcotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 1980
- Industrial Marketing ResearchJournal of Marketing Research, 1980
- Interspecies comparison of carcinogenic potencyJournal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, 1979
- High-level radioactive waste from light-water reactorsReviews of Modern Physics, 1977
- The fate of 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4,5-T) following oral administration to manToxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 1973
- The delaney clause and a scheme for rewarding good experimentationPreventive Medicine, 1973