Mass Reaction to Regime Change in Eastern Europe: Polarization or Leaders and Laggards?
- 1 April 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in British Journal of Political Science
- Vol. 24 (2) , 159-182
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123400009777
Abstract
Regime changes occur at two levels, the macro and the micro. In Eastern Europe there has been holistic change at the regime level, but at the micro level individuals can differ in their reactions, some favouring the new and some preferring the old regime, thus creating aggregates of supporters and opponents of the new regime. Combining reactions to the old and new regimes results in a typology of democrats, reactionaries, sceptics and the compliant. Nationwide surveys in Bulgaria, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Poland and Romania show that democrats overall are a bare majority of the respondents. If current divisions persist, then East Europeans will be politically polarized. Statistical tests of the influence of social structure and economic attitudes upon individual responses to regime change emphasize the importance of sociotropic economic assessments. But the data also show that most who do not currently support the pluralist regime expect to do so in the foreseeable future; they are laggards rather than anti-democrats. Moreover, the level of future support is so high that it is likely to be proof against fluctuations in the economic conditions of the new regimes.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- OPINION RESEARCH AND THE FALL OF COMMUNISM: POLAND 1981–1990International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 1992
- Escaping from Absolute DissatisfactionJournal of Theoretical Politics, 1992
- Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin AmericaBulletin of Latin American Research, 1992
- Citizen Politics in Western Democracies: Public Opinion and Political Parties in the United States, Great Britain, West Germany, and France.Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews, 1989
- The Sources and Structure of Legitimation in Western Democracies: A Consolidated Model Tested with Time-Series Data in Six Countries Since World War IIAmerican Sociological Review, 1989
- Statistics for Social Data AnalysisTeaching Sociology, 1989
- Sociotropic Politics: The American CaseBritish Journal of Political Science, 1981
- Elections without ChoiceBritish Journal of Sociology, 1980
- Public Opinion In European Socialist Systems. By Walter D. Connor and Zvi Y. Gitelman, with Adaline Hussczo and Robert Blumstock. New York and London: Praeger Publishers, 1977. x, 197 pp. Tables.Slavic Review, 1978
- Eastern Europe between The Wars, 1918-1941The American Historical Review, 1946