Life Under Pressure: France and England, 1670–1870
- 3 March 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in The Journal of Economic History
- Vol. 44 (1) , 27-47
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022050700031351
Abstract
Comparative methods are used to examine two hypotheses derived from Wrigley and Schofield's Population History of England. Contrary to their expectations, economic shocks produced greater marriage responses in France than in England, and the early onset of family limitation in France did not increase the responsiveness of marital fertility to living standards in the aggregate. Mortality was strongly dependent on economic shocks only in France prior to 1740. The results question the usefulness of Maithusian models for early modern European economic history.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Fertility Transition in Rural France, 1740–1829The Journal of Economic History, 1984
- On the Social Control of Human ReproductionPopulation and Development Review, 1980
- Le mouvement annuel de la population française rurale de 1670 a 1740Population, 1979
- Sixième rapport sur la situation démographique de la FrancePopulation, 1977
- Mouvement naturel de la population française de 1740 a 1829Population, 1975
- Malthusianisme démographique et malthusianisme économique : Réflexions sur l'échec industriel de la Normandie à l'époque du démarrageAnnales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales, 1972
- Angleterre et France au XVIIIe siècle : essai d'analyse comparée de deux croissances économiquesAnnales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales, 1966