AN ANALYSIS OF VERBAL‐PERFORMANCE INTELLIGENCE QUOTIENT DISCREPANCIES IN THE WECHSLER ADULT INTELLIGENCE SCALE RESULTS OF MENTALLY SUBNORMAL HOSPITAL PATIENTS
- 28 June 1978
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
- Vol. 22 (2) , 147-153
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.1978.tb00971.x
Abstract
Verbal-Performance IQ discrepancies on the WAIS [Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale] are of much interest to clinical psychologists. They are related, among other things, to different types of brain damage and in studies of the mentally subnormal, to successful adjustment to the outside world. Such discrepancies obtained by patients in a hospital for the mentally subnormal were studied. These discrepancies are both frequent and related to full scale IQ. The pattern that emerges remains constant if scaled scores are considered or if the subtests are re-arranged according to Cohen''s A and B factors. These findings imply caution in the use of the discrepancy measure as a diagnostic or predictive indicator in this population.This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Research with the Wechsler Intelligence Scales for Adults.Psychological Bulletin, 1966
- WAIS performances of brain damaged and neurotic patientsJournal of Clinical Psychology, 1964
- Significant Factors in Placing Mental Retardates from a Workshop SituationThe Personnel and Guidance Journal, 1962
- WAIS verbal minus performance IQ comparisons in mental retardatesJournal of Clinical Psychology, 1961
- Two types of tables for use with Wechsler's intelligence scalesJournal of Clinical Psychology, 1960
- Relationship of differential electroencephalographic patterns to distribution of Wechsler‐Bellevue scoresNeurology, 1959
- Senescent Changes In Intellectual Ability Among Superior Older WomenJournal of Gerontology, 1959
- Effect of Dysphasia and Spatial Distortion on Wechsler-Bellevue ResultsArchives of Neurology & Psychiatry, 1958
- The correlation of intelligence and neurological findings on twenty-two patients autopsied for brain damage.Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1955