The Ambivalent State
- 1 September 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Urban Affairs Quarterly
- Vol. 25 (1) , 41-62
- https://doi.org/10.1177/004208168902500105
Abstract
The Reagan administration reduced federal spending on urban and regional development just when the American economy experienced massive restructuring. Federal withdrawals, however, rather than simply reducing governmental intervention in markets, produced a shift of action to the state and municipal level. The impact of restructuring caused state and local governments, often under pressure from business, to create a de facto national economic development policy. Governments fiercely competed with one another in a system of subnational mercantilism, the net effect of which probably was to reduce taxation on business. Whether the U.S. economy was strengthened as a whole remains unclear.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Institutional Arrangements For State And Local Industrial PolicyJournal of the American Planning Association, 1986
- Market Justice, Political JusticeAmerican Political Science Review, 1986
- Urban Response to Federal Program FlexibilityUrban Affairs Quarterly, 1986
- Economic Restructuring and the Rise of Urban Social MovementsUrban Affairs Quarterly, 1985
- Is state planning necessary for capital?: The US caseInternational Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 1985
- The Fiscal Crisis of the StatePublished by Springer Nature ,1973