Lipoprotein Particle Profiles by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Compared With Standard Lipids and Apolipoproteins in Predicting Incident Cardiovascular Disease in Women
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 24 February 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 119 (7) , 931-939
- https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.108.816181
Abstract
Background— Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy measures the number and size of lipoprotein particles instead of their cholesterol or triglyceride content, but its clinical utility is uncertain. Methods and Results— Baseline lipoproteins were measured by NMR in 27 673 initially healthy women followed up for incident cardiovascular disease (n=1015) over an 11-year period. After adjustment for nonlipid risk factors, hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the top versus the bottom quintile of NMR-measured lipoprotein particle concentration (measured in particles per liter) were 2.51 (1.91 to 3.30) for low-density lipoprotein (LDLNMR), 0.91 (0.75 to 1.12) for high-density lipoprotein (HDLNMR), 1.71 (1.38 to 2.12) for very low–density lipoprotein (VLDLNMR), and 2.25 (1.80 to 2.81) for the LDLNMR/HDLNMR ratio. Similarly adjusted results for NMR-measured lipoprotein particle size (measured in nanometers) were 0.64 (0.52 to 0.79) for LDLNMR size, 0.65 (0.51 to 0.81) for HDLNMR size, and 1.37 (1.10 to 1.70) for VLDLNMR size. Hazard ratios for NMR measures were comparable but not superior to standard lipids (total cholesterol 2.08 [1.63 to 2.67], LDL cholesterol 1.74 [1.40 to 2.16], HDL cholesterol 0.52 [0.42 to 0.64], triglycerides 2.58 [1.95 to 3.41], non-HDL cholesterol 2.52 [1.95 to 3.25], total/HDL cholesterol ratio 2.82 [2.23 to 3.58]) and apolipoproteins (B100 2.57 [1.98 to 3.33], A-1 0.63 [0.52 to 0.77], and B100/A-1 ratio 2.79 [2.21 to 3.54]). Essentially no reclassification improvement was found with the addition of the LDLNMR particle concentration or apolipoprotein B100 to a model that already included the total/HDL cholesterol ratio and nonlipid risk factors (net reclassification index 0% and 1.9%, respectively), nor did the addition of either variable result in a statistically significant improvement in the c-index. Conclusions— In this prospective study of healthy women, cardiovascular disease risk prediction associated with lipoprotein profiles evaluated by NMR was comparable but not superior to that of standard lipids or apolipoproteins.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- LDL particle number and risk of future cardiovascular disease in the Framingham Offspring Study—Implications for LDL managementJournal of Clinical Lipidology, 2007
- High-Density Lipoprotein as a Therapeutic TargetJAMA, 2007
- Fasting Compared With Nonfasting Triglycerides and Risk of Cardiovascular Events in WomenJAMA, 2007
- Inhibition of Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein by Torcetrapib Modestly Increases Macrophage Cholesterol Efflux to HDLArteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, 2007
- Value of Low-Density Lipoprotein Particle Number and Size as Predictors of Coronary Artery Disease in Apparently Healthy Men and WomenJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2007
- Low-Dose Aspirin in the Primary Prevention of CancerJAMA, 2005
- Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control studyThe Lancet, 2004
- European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practiceAtherosclerosis, 2003
- Low-Density Lipoprotein Particle Concentration and Size as Determined by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy as Predictors of Cardiovascular Disease in WomenCirculation, 2002
- Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy of Lipoproteins and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease in the Cardiovascular Health StudyArteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, 2002