Abstract
Leading singularity analysis for the susceptibility index γ of these planar models had indicated a nonuniversal variation in the index between the classical spin models and the spin-½ model in three dimensions. Using existing methods of analysis which allow for confluent corrections to the leading singularity, we have reanalyzed the existing susceptibility series for γ as well as the second-moment series for the correlation length index ν for the classical models. Our results are consistent with the following universal values of the indices γ=1.333±0.010 and ν=0.678±0.005. In addition, our analysis suggests that the nonanalytic correction to scaling is absent in the spin-½ model and that the correction to scaling exponent Δ1 may be different for the two classical models investigated, being 0.78±0.08 for the planar rotator model and 0.60±0.08 for the s= XY model. Analysis of existing series for the second field derivative of the susceptibility to determine the gap index Δ has indicated a slight difference between the s=12 and the classical spin values, 1.70±0.02 and 1.67±0.01, respectively. This small difference probably reflects a defect in the analysis, since our analysis clearly indicates that assuming confluent corrections does not satisfactorily account for the scaling corrections in these second-field derivative series.