RAF inhibitors transactivate RAF dimers and ERK signalling in cells with wild-type BRAF

Top Cited Papers
Open Access
Abstract
Abnormal activation of the RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK signalling pathway is a feature of many human cancers, making it an attractive target for antitumour therapy. Several RAF and MEK inhibitors are in clinical trials, but an unexpected complication has emerged. Although selective BRAF inhibitors are effective in treating mutant BRAF melanoma, in which they potently suppress RAF-MEK-ERK signalling, the same inhibitors are ineffective against tumours that carry an oncogenic mutation in the KRAS gene. Two groups now report that the reason for this dramatic difference is that RAF 'inhibitors' have dual activity, functioning as either inhibitors or activators of RAF, depending on the cellular context and mutational status of RAF. In News & Views, Karen Cichowski and Pasi Jänne discuss the mechanistic and clinical implications of these findings and similar work reported in Cell. The RAS–RAF signalling pathway is an attractive target for drug development in oncology, and several RAF inhibitors are being tested in clinical trials. Here and in an accompanying paper, RAF inhibitors are shown to have opposing roles, functioning as either inhibitors or activators of RAF depending on the cellular context and mutational status of RAF. The mechanistic basis for these opposing roles is dissected. The results have implications for the clinical use of these inhibitors and for the design of kinase inhibitors. Tumours with mutant BRAF are dependent on the RAF–MEK–ERK signalling pathway for their growth1,2,3. We found that ATP-competitive RAF inhibitors inhibit ERK signalling in cells with mutant BRAF, but unexpectedly enhance signalling in cells with wild-type BRAF. Here we demonstrate the mechanistic basis for these findings. We used chemical genetic methods to show that drug-mediated transactivation of RAF dimers is responsible for paradoxical activation of the enzyme by inhibitors. Induction of ERK signalling requires direct binding of the drug to the ATP-binding site of one kinase of the dimer and is dependent on RAS activity. Drug binding to one member of RAF homodimers (CRAF–CRAF) or heterodimers (CRAF–BRAF) inhibits one protomer, but results in transactivation of the drug-free protomer. In BRAF(V600E) tumours, RAS is not activated, thus transactivation is minimal and ERK signalling is inhibited in cells exposed to RAF inhibitors. These results indicate that RAF inhibitors will be effective in tumours in which BRAF is mutated. Furthermore, because RAF inhibitors do not inhibit ERK signalling in other cells, the model predicts that they would have a higher therapeutic index and greater antitumour activity than mitogen-activated protein kinase (MEK) inhibitors, but could also cause toxicity due to MEK/ERK activation. These predictions have been borne out in a recent clinical trial of the RAF inhibitor PLX4032 (refs 4, 5). The model indicates that promotion of RAF dimerization by elevation of wild-type RAF expression or RAS activity could lead to drug resistance in mutant BRAF tumours. In agreement with this prediction, RAF inhibitors do not inhibit ERK signalling in cells that coexpress BRAF(V600E) and mutant RAS.