Optimised sample DNA preparation for detection ofChlamydia trachomatis in synovial tissue by polymerase chain reaction and ligase chain reaction
Open Access
- 1 February 2001
- journal article
- other
- Published by Elsevier in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
- Vol. 60 (2) , 140-145
- https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.60.2.140
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Molecular biology techniques such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and ligase chain reaction (LCR) are routinely used in research for detection ofC trachomatis DNA in synovial samples, and these methods are now in use in some clinical laboratories. This study aimed at determining the method best suited to molecular diagnosis ofC trachomatis by examining four standard DNA preparation methods using chlamydia spiked synovial tissue and chlamydia infected monocytes. METHODS Synovial tissue from a chlamydia negative patient with rheumatoid arthritis was spiked with defined numbers of C trachomatiselementary bodies (EB). Purified human peripheral monocytes from normal donors were infected with the organism at a multiplicity of infection 1:1 in vitro and harvested after four days. DNA was prepared from all samples by four methods: (1) QIAmp tissue kit; (2) homogenisation in 65°C phenol; (3) incubation at 97°C; (4) proteinase K digestion at 97°C. DNA from methods 1 and 2 was subjected to PCR using two different primer sets, each targeting the C trachomatis omp1 gene. LCR was done on DNA prepared by each method. RESULTS In synovial tissue samples spiked with EB, and in monocytes persistently infected with the organism, preparation of template using the QIAmp tissue kit (method 1) and the hot phenol extraction technique (method 2) allowed sensitive detection of C trachomatis DNA. These methods also produced template from both sample types for LCR. DNA prepared by heat denaturation (method 3) allowed only low sensitivity chlamydia detection in LCR and did not work at all for PCR. Proteinase K digestion plus heat denaturation (method 4) gave template that did not allow amplification in either PCR or LCR assays. CONCLUSIONS The sensitivity of detection for C trachomatisDNA in synovial tissue by PCR and LCR depends strongly on the method used for preparation of the amplification template. LCR targeting the multicopy chlamydial plasmid and two nested PCR assay systems targeting the single copy omp1 gene showed roughly equivalent sensitivity. Importantly, template preparation method and the specific PCR primer system used for screening must be optimised in relation to one another for highest sensitivity.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Optimised sample preparation of synovial fluid for detection ofChlamydia trachomatis DNA by polymerase chain reactionAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 1999
- Ultrastructural and molecular analyses of the persistence ofChlamydia trachomatis(serovar K) in human monocytesMicrobial Pathogenesis, 1997
- Evaluation of commercially available tests for Chlamydia nucleic acid detection in synovial fluid of patientsRheumatology, 1997
- Comparison of synovial tissue and synovial fluid as the source of nucleic acids for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by polymerase chain reactionArthritis & Rheumatism, 1996
- In Situ Hybridization for Detection of Inapparent Infection With Chlamydia trachomatis in Synovial Tissue of a Patient With Reiter’s SyndromeThe Lancet Healthy Longevity, 1995
- Intracellular location of inapparently infecting Chlamydia in synovial tissue from patients with Reiter's syndromeImmunologic Research, 1994
- Intracellular persistence of chlamydial major outer-membrane protein, lipopolysaccharide and ribosomal RNA after non-productive infection of human monocytes with Chlamydia trachomatis serovar KJournal of Medical Microbiology, 1993
- A SEARCH FOR CHLAMYDIA TRACHOMATIS IN SYNOVIAL FLUIDS FROM PATIENTS WITH REACTIVE ARTHRITIS USING THE POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION AND ANTIGEN DETECTION METHODSRheumatology, 1992
- Chlamydial isolates from Reiter's syndrome.Sexually Transmitted Infections, 1973
- Needle Biopsy of the Synovial Membrane — Experience with the Parker–Pearson TechnicNew England Journal of Medicine, 1972