The changing “natural history” of symptomatic coronary artery disease: Basis versus bias
- 1 February 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Cardiology
- Vol. 51 (3) , 449-454
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9149(83)80078-2
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Bias in analytic researchPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- Evidence that hospital care for acute myocardial infarction has not contributed to the decline in coronary mortality between 1973-1974 and 1978-1979.Circulation, 1982
- Prognosis of Medically Treated Patients with Coronary-Artery Disease with Profound ST-Segment Depression during Exercise TestingNew England Journal of Medicine, 1981
- Effect of bypass surgery on survival in patients in low- and high-risk subgroups delineated by the use of simple clinical variables.Circulation, 1981
- Timolol-Induced Reduction in Mortality and Reinfarction in Patients Surviving Acute Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1981
- Survival in medically treated coronary artery disease.Circulation, 1979
- The decline in mortality from Coronary Heart Disease, U.S.A., 1968–1975Journal of Chronic Diseases, 1978
- Prognosis in coronary artery disease. Angiographic, hemodynamic, and clinical factors.Circulation, 1975
- Natural History of Ischemic Heart Disease in Relation to Arteriographic FindingsCirculation, 1974
- Natural history of angina pectoris in the Framingham study: Prognosis and survivalThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1972