Interpreting Modal Frequencies To Measure Social Norms
- 1 May 1980
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Sociological Methods & Research
- Vol. 8 (4) , 470-486
- https://doi.org/10.1177/004912418000800407
Abstract
The empirical study of social norms has been hampered b y a lack of standardized quantitative measures and criteria for the interpretation of research data. Two such criteria are suggested, both of them derived from the modal proportion of responses. The first, pk1rep , signifies a modal proportion large enough to represent a population norm The second criterian, pk1prom, is less stringent and indicates the presence of a prominent norm. Minority norms and plurality norms are also quantitatively defined. Two empirical examples are given to illustrate the utility of the suggested criteria.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- What is Not What in StatisticsJournal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician), 1977
- Comment on Hawkes's "Norms, Deviance, and Social Control"American Journal of Sociology, 1976
- Norms, Deviance, and Social Control: A Mathematical Elaboration of ConceptsAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1975
- NORMS, GROUPS AND POWER: THE SOCIOLOGY OF WORKPLACE INDUSTRIAL RELATIONSBritish Journal of Industrial Relations, 1974
- Measuring Social NormsThe Pacific Sociological Review, 1973
- College Students' Value Patterns in the 1950's and 1960'sSociology of Education, 1971
- Public Sense of Justice and Judicial PracticeActa Sociologica, 1967
- Norms: The Problem of Definition and ClassificationAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1965
- A Single-Sample Multiple-Decision Procedure for Selecting the Multinomial Event Which Has the Highest ProbabilityThe Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1959
- A Typology of NormsAmerican Sociological Review, 1956