Prevalence of Antitissue Transglutaminase Antibodies in Different Degrees of Intestinal Damage in Celiac Disease
- 1 March 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology
- Vol. 36 (3) , 219-221
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00004836-200303000-00007
Abstract
Although anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies (anti-tTG) are effective for celiac disease (CD) routine laboratory screening, there are no studies evaluating correlation between degree of intestinal damage and positivity to anti-tTG. Since recent studies showed that anti-gliadin (AGA) and anti-endomysium (EMA) antibodies are ineffective in diagnosing mild gluten-sensitive enteropathy, the aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of anti-tTG in different degrees of intestinal damage of celiac patients and whether there is a correlation between serum value of anti-tTG and the degree of histologic damage. We studied 119 consecutive adult patients affected by CD (47 men and 72 women; mean age, 28 years; range, 22–51 years). All patients were stratified for histologic damage according to Marsh classification, and in all of them an anti-tTG evaluation was performed. Marsh I lesions were present in 13 patients (10.92%), Marsh II in 24 anti-tTG (20.16%), Marsh IIIa in 27 anti-tTG (22.68%), Marsh IIIb in 31 anti-tTG (26.05%) and Marsh IIIc in 24 anti-tTG (20.16%). Anti-tTG positivity was ranging from 1 of 13 anti-tTG (7.69%) in Marsh I lesions to 23 of 24 anti-tTG (95.83%) in Marsh IIIc lesions respectively (P < 0.005), while mean serum value of anti-tTG ranged from 3.61 (range, 0.7–9.2) UA/mL in Marsh I lesions to 7.3 (range, 1–25.1), 18.5 (range, 1.8–56.2), 36 (range, 3.7–83.5) and 74.95 (range, 6.5–257) UA/mL in Marsh II, IIIb and IIIc lesions respectively (P < 0.005). Our study showed that anti-tTG prevalence and their mean serum value was higher in celiacs with severe enteropathy (Marsh IIIb-c lesions) than in those showing slight enteropathy (Marsh I-IIIa). So, serologic tests without histologic evaluation may underestimate the real prevalence of CD and there is the risk of delaying the diagnosis of CD in patients who run an increased risk of deficiencies, non-malignant conditions and malignancy.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Low Prevalence of Antigliadin and Anti-Endomysium Antibodies in Subclinical/Silent Celiac DiseaseAmerican Journal of Gastroenterology, 2001
- Reliance on Serum Endomysial Antibody Testing Underestimates the True Prevalence of Coeliac Disease by One FifthScandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 2000
- Sensitivity of Antiendomysium and Antigliadin Antibodies in Untreated Celiac Disease: Disappointing in Clinical PracticeAmerican Journal of Gastroenterology, 1999
- Autoantibodies to tissue transglutaminase as predictors of celiac diseaseGastroenterology, 1998
- Identification of tissue transglutaminase as the autoantigen of celiac diseaseNature Medicine, 1997
- Is human umbilical cord the most suitable substrate for the detection of endomysium antibodies in the screening and follow-up of coeliac disease?European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 1997
- Screening test for coeliac diseaseThe Lancet, 1997
- Serological screening of coeliac disease: choosing the optimal procedure according to various prevalence values.Gut, 1994
- Gluten, major histocompatibility complex, and the small intestineGastroenterology, 1992
- Celiac SprueNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991