Dominance, allele frequency and selection in a population ofDrosophila melanogaster
- 24 June 1980
- journal article
- research article
- Published by The Royal Society in Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences
- Vol. 208 (1171) , 163-187
- https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1980.0048
Abstract
The number of sternopleural chaetae of 18 inbred lines derived from the Texas [USA] population of D. melanogaster was ascertained for flies raised at each of 2 temperatures, 18.degree. and 25.degree. C. Two characters were then defined: M, the average of the chaeta numbers at the 2 temperatures; and S, half of the difference between the average chaeta numbers at the 2 temperatures. The inbred lines differed among themselves in both characters, thus revealing genetic variation in the Texas population for them both. There was no correlation between the values of M and S among the lines. The mean of the inbred lines did not differ significantly from that of the progenies of 22 single-pair matings among flies taken from the population in either character, suggesting that the 18 inbred lines provided a fair sample of the genes in the population. The differences between the variances among the inbred lines and the biparental progenies suggested that dominance was present for both characters and that dominant alleles were, in general, present at higher frequencies than their recessive alleles. This was confirmed by a half-diallel experiment with 11 of the 18 inbred lines as parents. The half-diallel further showed that dominance was ambidirectional for character S, but gave no conclusive evidence in this respect for M. The theoretical consequences of ambidirectional dominance combined with higher frequencies of dominant alleles were considered for a simple model involving 4 loci. This showed, in particular, that when one homozygous line (the recurrent parent) is crossed to a number of other lines (the non-recurrent parents), the amount by which the phenotype of the F1 exceeds the mean of its 2 parents shows a regression of negative slope on the phenotype of the non-recurrent parent. The regression line is expected to cut the axis of zero excess at a point that is, on average, as far away from the phenotype of maximum dominance as is the expression of the character in the recurrent parent, but in the opposite direction. The point mid-way between the recurrent parent and the intercept thus provides an estimate of the phenotype of maximum dominance. Estimates of the phenotypes of maximum dominance were obtained in this way for both character, M and S, by data from the half-diallel and from a further experiment carried out for the purpose. For character M, the phenotype of maximum dominance does not depart significantly from the mean of the inbreds or from that of the Texas population itself; but, for S, though close to the means, it is significantly higher than them. This type of genetic architecture can be expected with characters under stabilizing selection. The phenotype of maximum dominance is the optimal phenotype towards which selection is acting.This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Genotype—environment interaction III. Interactions in Drosophila melanogasterProceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences, 1975
- Competition in Drosophila I: A case of stabilising selectionHeredity, 1971
- Variation for metrical characters in Drosophila populations III. The nature of selectionHeredity, 1971
- Variation for metrical characters in Drosophila populations I. Genetic analysisHeredity, 1970
- Variation for metrical characters in Drosophila populations II. Natural selectionHeredity, 1970
- D. Quantitative and population genetics Variability and selectionProceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences, 1966
- The organisation of polygenic activity within a chromosome in DrosophilaHeredity, 1960
- Genetical control of stability in developmentHeredity, 1953
- The genetical theory of natural selectionPublished by Biodiversity Heritage Library ,1930
- The Possible Modification of the Response of the Wild Type to Recurrent MutationsThe American Naturalist, 1928