Comparison of Pure-Tone Audibility Thresholds Obtained with Audiological and Two-Interval Forced-Choice Procedures
- 1 March 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Speech Language Hearing Association in Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
- Vol. 29 (1) , 82-91
- https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.2901.82
Abstract
Audibility thresholds were measured at 500 and 4000 Hz with a standard clinical procedure and a two-interval, forced-choice (2IFC) adaptive procedure for 72 normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners, age 17 to 83. Psychometric functions were obtained for clinical, 2IFC, and Yes-No procedures. A measure of response bias was obtained from the Yes-No procedure. The 2IFC adaptive thresholds were 6.5 dB lower than audiological thresholds. The psychometric functions for the forced?choice procedures were generally shallower than those for the clinical procedure and were shifted to lower sound pressure levels. Response bias played a small role at best in accounting for the magnitude of the difference in threshold estimated by the adaptive and clinical procedures or for the differences among the psychometric functions.This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Aging and Decision Criteria for the Detection of Tones in NoiseJournal of Gerontology, 1977
- Detectability of auditory signals presented without defined observation intervalsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1976
- Masking-Level Differences as a Function of Interaural Disparities in Intensity of Signal and of NoiseThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1965
- Feedback and Noise-Signal Detection at Three Performance LevelsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1965