Implicit theories of criminal responsibility: Decision making and the insanity defense.
- 1 January 1987
- journal article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Law and Human Behavior
- Vol. 11 (3) , 207-232
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01044643
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- The death-qualified jury and the defense of insanity.Law and Human Behavior, 1984
- The effects of death qualification on jurors' predisposition to convict and on the quality of deliberation.Law and Human Behavior, 1984
- Due process vs. crime control: Death qualification and jury attitudes.Law and Human Behavior, 1984
- John Hinckley, Jr. and the Insanity Defense: The Public's VerdictPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1983
- Judgments of causation, responsibility, and punishment in cases of harm-doing.Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 1981
- Intervening causation and the mitigation of responsibility for harmBritish Journal of Social Psychology, 1981
- Selective Reporting and the Public's Misconceptions of the Criminally InsanePublic Opinion Quarterly, 1977
- Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probabilityCognitive Psychology, 1973
- Attribution of Responsibility as a Basis for Sanctioning BehaviourBritish Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1969
- Mens ReaHarvard Law Review, 1932