An Evaluation of Paper-and-Pencil and Computer-Assisted Simulations
- 1 October 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SLACK, Inc. in Journal Of Nursing Education
- Vol. 22 (8) , 315-323
- https://doi.org/10.3928/0148-4834-19831001-02
Abstract
Two formats of delivering clinical simulations for nurse practitioners were evaluated in this study. The two formats included paper-and-pencil, latent-image format, and computer-assisted instruction. Twelve students in a graduate family nurse practitioner curriculum were the subjects. They reported no preference for type of format nor were any differences observed in student performance when comparing the two formats. The cost for the latent-image format was estimated at approximately $8500 and the cost for computer simulation at approximately $10,500. The implications of these findings for nursing curriculums are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Validation StudyNursing Research, 1981
- Educational Uses of the PLATO Computer SystemScience, 1976
- Let the Computer Teach ItThe American Journal of Nursing, 1975
- Survey and evaluation of approaches to physician performance measurementAcademic Medicine, 1973
- The validity of Patient Management ProblemsAcademic Medicine, 1973
- Computer Assisted Instruction for Continued LearningThe American Journal of Nursing, 1972
- Feedback procedures in programmed instruction.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1971
- CLINICAL NURSING INSTRUCTION VIA THE PLATO SIMULATED LABORATORYNursing Research, 1966
- An Objective Evaluation of Clinical CompetenceNew England Journal of Medicine, 1965
- Problems and prospectus of teaching with a computer.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1964