Overriding a Patient's Refusal of Treatment after an Iatrogenic Complication
- 26 June 1997
- journal article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 336 (26) , 1908-1910
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199706263362611
Abstract
An iatrogenic complication is an unfavorable response to medical treatment that is induced by the therapeutic effort itself.1 Although some are minor, others are life-threatening. Serious or fatal iatrogenic complications occur in 4 to 9 percent of hospitalized patients.24 One retrospective series found that 14 percent of cardiac arrests could be traced to an iatrogenic event.5 Physicians often treat conditions caused by iatrogenic complications differently from other medical conditions.6 In this article we shall consider various reasons that might be used to justify making a distinction, in particular the arguments used to justify overriding a do-not-resuscitate (DNR)7 order after . . .Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Use of the medical futility rationale in do-not-attempt-resuscitation ordersPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1995
- Biases in how physicians choose to withdraw life supportThe Lancet, 1993
- The heart of darknessJournal of General Internal Medicine, 1992
- Incidence and characteristics of preventable iatrogenic cardiac arrestsPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1991
- “Do-Not-Resuscitate” Orders during Anesthesia and SurgeryAnesthesiology, 1991
- Incidence of Adverse Events and Negligence in Hospitalized PatientsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- On Not Harming: Two TraditionsJournal of Medicine and Philosophy, 1988
- Physician management of patients with adverse outcomesArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1986
- Iatrogenic Illness on a General Medical Service at a University HospitalNew England Journal of Medicine, 1981
- The Hazards of HospitalizationAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1964