Patterns of use, dosing, and economic impact of biologic agent use in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a retrospective cohort study
Open Access
- 14 October 2004
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
- Vol. 5 (1) , 36
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-5-36
Abstract
Background: Variability in dosing and costs of biologics among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is of interest to healthcare descision-makers. We examined dosing and costs among RA patients newly treated with infliximab or etanercept under conditions of typical clinical practice. Methods: Integrated pharmacy and medical claims data were obtained from 61 U.S. health plans. RA patients newly treated with infliximab or etanercept between July 1999–June 2002 were selected. A maintenance number of infliximab vials was determined after the "loading period" (2–3 infusions); those with ≥ 2 occurrences of an increase in vials or an interval between infusions of <49 days were considered to have had escalated. For etanercept patients, escalation was based on ≥ 2 instances of increased average daily dose. Multiple logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess variables associated with dose escalation. RA-related costs at one year post-initiation also were examined; comparisons were made using generalized linear models. Results: A total of 1,548 patients were identified (n = 598 and 950 for infliximab and etanercept respectively). Infliximab recipients were somewhat older (50.5 vs. 46.6 years for etanercept). Nearly 60% of infliximab patients increased their dose at one year, compared to 18% for etanercept. Infliximab patients who escalated dose incurred a 25% increase in mean one-year costs ($20,915 vs. $16,713 for no increase; p < 0.0001). Costs among etanercept patients did not substantially differ based on dose escalation ($14,482 vs. $13,866 respectively). Conclusions: Infliximab is associated with higher rates of dose escalation relative to etanercept, which contributes to substantially higher one-year medical costs.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Dose escalation of infliximab in clinical practice: improvements seen may be explained by a regression-like effectAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 2004
- Etanercept, infliximab, and leflunomide in established rheumatoid arthritis: clinical experience using a structured follow up programme in southern SwedenAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 2002
- The relationship of serum infliximab concentrations to clinical improvement in rheumatoid arthritis: Results from ATTRACT, a multicenter, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trialArthritis & Rheumatism, 2002
- Infliximab (chimeric anti-tumour necrosis factor α monoclonal antibody) versus placebo in rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving concomitant methotrexate: a randomised phase III trialThe Lancet, 1999
- Treatment of Active Rheumatoid Arthritis With Leflunomide Compared With Placebo and MethotrexateArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1999
- Etanercept Therapy in Rheumatoid ArthritisAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1999
- A Trial of Etanercept, a Recombinant Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor:Fc Fusion Protein, in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Receiving MethotrexateNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Efficacy and safety of the new DMARD leflunomide: Comparison to placebo and sulfasalazine in active rheumatoid arthritisScandinavian Journal of Rheumatology, 1999
- Methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis: An updatewith focus on mechanisms involved in toxicitySeminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism, 1998
- Special article the economic cost and social and psychological impact of musculoskeletal conditionsArthritis & Rheumatism, 1995