Comparison of Three Methods for Assessing Plum Pox Virus Variability: Further Evidence for the Existence of Two Major Groups of Isolates
- 1 October 1994
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Phytopathology
- Vol. 142 (2) , 163-172
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0434.1994.tb04526.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- A polymerase chain reaction assay adapted to plum pox potyvirus detectionPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- A highly sensitive immunocapture polymerase chain reaction method for plum pox potyvirus detectionJournal of Virological Methods, 1992
- Differentiation of potyviruses and their strains by hybridization with the 3′ non-coding region of the viral genomeJournal of Virological Methods, 1992
- A PCR membrane spot assay for the detection of plum pox virus RNA in bark of infected treesJournal of Virological Methods, 1991
- Dot hybridization detection of plum pox virus using 32P-labeled RNA probes representing non-structural viral protein genesJournal of Virological Methods, 1990
- Serological and Biological Variability of Virus Isolates Related to Strains of Papaya Ringspot VirusPhytopathology®, 1990
- Identification and classification of potyviruses on the basis of coat protein sequence data and serologyArchiv für die gesamte Virusforschung, 1989
- The complete nucleotide sequence of plum pox potyvirus RNAVirus Research, 1989
- Coat protein of potyviruses. I. Comparison of the four Australian strains of sugarcane mosaic virusVirology, 1981
- Cleavage of Structural Proteins during the Assembly of the Head of Bacteriophage T4Nature, 1970