Functional advantages of laparoscopic live-donor nephrectomy compared with conventional open-donor nephrectomy

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Live-donor kidney transplants accounted for only 27% of all kidney transplants performed in the United States in 1995. Prolonged hospitalization, pain, extended convalescence, and related socioeconomic concerns associated with traditional open-donor nephrectomy surgery may discourage potential donors, contributing to a low percentage of live kidney donors. To remove such disincentives, the laparoscopic live-donor nephrectomy procedure was introduced. In this study, the postdischarge course of 10 laparoscopic nephrectomy donors was compared with that of 27 open nephrectomy donors over the same time period. Laparoscopic nephrectomy donors experienced significantly shorter hospitalizations, less pain, felt able to return to work and normal routines sooner, and needed significantly less assistance during the recuperation period than did open nephrectomy donors. The laparoscopic nephrectomy procedure may decrease many of the concerns of potential donors, thus making live kidney donation more attractive and increasing the kidney supply.