The significance of bcr-abl molecular detection in chronic myeloid leukemia patients “late,” 18 months or more after transplantation
- 15 September 2001
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by American Society of Hematology in Blood
- Vol. 98 (6) , 1701-1707
- https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.v98.6.1701
Abstract
The bcr-abl chimeric messenger RNA is frequently detected in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients after bone marrow transplantation. It was previously reported that the relapse risk of bcr-abl detection 6 to 12 months after transplantation was greater than 40%. This risk decreased as the time between transplantation and detection increased. To further define the relapse risk associated with bcr-abl molecular detection in “late” CML survivors, 379 consecutive CML patients alive at 18 months after transplantation or later were studied. Ninety of 379 patients (24%) had at least one positive bcr-abltest 18 months after transplantation or later; 13 of 90bcr-abl–positive patients (14%) and 3 of 289bcr-abl–negative patients (1.0%) relapsed. The median time from bcr-abl detection to relapse was 916 days (range, 251-2654 days). The hazard ratio of relapse associated withbcr-abl detection was 19.2 (P < .0001). The stage of disease, chronic graft-versus-host disease, and the donor type did not alter the association between bcr-abland relapse. Quantification of bcr-abl was performed on 344 samples from 85 bcr-abl–positive patients by means of a real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction assay. The median bcr-abl change of patients who relapsed was significantly greater than those that remained in remission (P = .002). The median bcr-abl level at relapse was 40 443 bcr-abl copies per μg RNA (range, 960-299 552). Of 73 bcr-abl–positive patients who failed to relapse, 69% had only one positive test at a median of 24 copiesbcr-abl per μg RNA. The detection of bcr-ablis common following transplantation. The prognostic significance of a qualitative bcr-abl can be refined by quantitative assays and thus may target patients who would benefit from early intervention.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Monitoring chronic myeloid leukaemia therapy by real‐time quantitative PCR in blood is a reliable alternative to bone marrow cytogeneticsBritish Journal of Haematology, 1999
- Detection of BCR-ABL transcripts in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) using a ‘real time’ quantitative RT-PCR assayLeukemia, 1999
- Quantitation of minimal residual disease in Philadelphia chromosome positive chronic myeloid leukaemia patients using real‐time quantitative RT‐PCRBritish Journal of Haematology, 1998
- Measurement of Residual Leukemia during Remission in Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic LeukemiaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Value of PCR analysis for long term survivors after allogeneic bone marrow transplant for chronic myelogenous leukemia: a comparative studyLeukemia & Lymphoma, 1996
- Avoiding false positives with PCRNature, 1989
- Diagnosis of chronic myeloid and acute lymphocytic leukemias by detection of leukemia-specific mRNA sequences amplified in vitro.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1988
- Methotrexate and Cyclosporine Compared with Cyclosporine Alone for Prophylaxis of Acute Graft versus Host Disease after Marrow Transplantation for LeukemiaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986
- Fused transcript of abl and bcr genes in chronic myelogenous leukaemiaNature, 1985
- An alteration of the human c-abl protein in K562 leukemia cells unmasks associated tyrosine kinase activityCell, 1984