Response coincidence analysis as evidence for language acquisition strategies
- 1 September 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Applied Psycholinguistics
- Vol. 3 (3) , 193-221
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0142716400001399
Abstract
New analytical techniques were developed for the identification of subject groups based on within-subject patterns of cooccurrences of responses. These “response coincidence analyses” provided an empirical basis for conjectures about stages or strategies in terms of the rules which characterize group performances. The nature of the operative rules was inferred from an analysis of item response similarities within the subject groups. These techniques were applied to a data set originally obtained by Innes (1974) from 120 children (20 at each age from 2 to 7 years), for a study of the acquisition of the English inflectional morphology for pluralization. The results show quite clearly how the pluralization system is acquired and indicate how such data can be used to develop the specification of rules sensitive to psycholinguistic evidence.This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Nonmetric Individual Differences Multidimensional Scaling: An Alternating Least Squares Method with Optimal Scaling FeaturesPsychometrika, 1977
- An ‘Information structure’ view of languageCanadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique, 1976
- Roger Brown, A first language: the early stages. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1973. Pp. xi + 437.Journal of Child Language, 1974
- A First LanguagePublished by Harvard University Press ,1973
- Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an n-way generalization of “Eckart-Young” decompositionPsychometrika, 1970
- The Acquisition of Noun and Verb InflectionsChild Development, 1968
- English Pluralization Rules of Six-Year-Old ChildrenChild Development, 1967
- The Child's Learning of English MorphologyWORD, 1958