Have community supervision officers changed their attitudes toward their work?
- 1 June 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Justice Quarterly
- Vol. 6 (2) , 233-246
- https://doi.org/10.1080/07418828900090161
Abstract
Studies of probation and parole officers' attitudes conducted in the 1960s and 1970s indicated respondents' preference for assistance over authority as the most important goal of community supervision. The present research compares results obtained from the 1970s and 1980s applications of the Authority/Assistance Questionnaire and the Correctional Policy Inventory. The findings point not only to increased concern for authority but also to the diminished meaningfulness of the assistance objective. The authors suggest that a new emphasis on surveillance, in which delivery on service is largely a means for monitoring client risk, has “crowded” the rehabilitative ideal.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Typology of Presentence Probation InvestigatorsInternational Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 1987
- Public Opinion and Prison Policy: A ReviewThe Prison Journal, 1984
- Adult Probation and Parole Officers: Influence of Their Weapons, Role Perceptions and Role ConflictCriminal Justice Review, 1984
- The Attitudes and Decisions of Probation OfficersCriminal Justice and Behavior, 1982
- REHABILITATION AND PROTECTIONOffender Rehabilitation, 1979
- A Theory of Probation SupervisionThe Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science, 1972
- Functional Specialization in Probation and ParoleCrime & Delinquency, 1969
- How Adult Probation Officers View Their Job ResponsibilitiesCrime & Delinquency, 1966
- Compliance, identification, and internalization three processes of attitude changeJournal of Conflict Resolution, 1958
- A New Coefficient for Scalogram AnalysisPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1953