Using Scott Domains to Explicate the Notions of Approximate and Idealized Data
- 1 June 1987
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Philosophy of Science
- Vol. 54 (2) , 194-221
- https://doi.org/10.1086/289370
Abstract
This paper utilizes Scott domains (continuous lattices) to provide a mathematical model for the use of idealized and approximately true data in the testing of scientific theories. Key episodes from the history of science can be understood in terms of this model as attempts to demonstrate that theories are monotonic, that is, yield better predictions when fed better or more realistic data. However, as we show, monotonicity and truth of theories are independent notions. A formal description is given of the pragmatic virtues of theories which are monotonic. We also introduce the stronger concept of continuity and show how it relates to the finite nature of scientific computations. Finally, we show that the space of theories also has the structure of a Scott domain. This result provides an analysis of how one theory can be said to approximate another.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- The spring-mass system revisitedAmerican Journal of Physics, 1984
- AN UNREAL IMAGEThe British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 1984
- What is Wrong with VerisimilitudePhilosophy Research Archives, 1984
- How the Laws of Physics LiePublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,1983
- The Scientific ImagePublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,1980
- Independent Testability: The Michelson-Morley and Kennedy-Thorndike ExperimentsPhilosophy of Science, 1980
- Truthlikeness: Comments on recent discussionSynthese, 1978
- Newton's experimentum crucis and the logic of idealization and theory refutationStudies in History and Philosophy of Science, 1978
- Data Types as LatticesSIAM Journal on Computing, 1976
- On the Extension of Beth's Semantics of Physical TheoriesPhilosophy of Science, 1970