Paying For Quality: Providers’ Incentives For Quality Improvement
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 1 March 2004
- journal article
- Published by Health Affairs (Project Hope) in Health Affairs
- Vol. 23 (2) , 127-141
- https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.23.2.127
Abstract
Paying health care providers to meet quality goals is an idea with widespread appeal, given the common perception that quality of care in the United States remains unacceptably low despite a decade of benchmarking and public reporting. There has been little critical analysis of the design of the current generation of quality incentive programs. In this paper we examine public reports of paying for quality over the past five years and assess each of the identified programs in terms of key design features, including the market share of payers, the structure of the reward system, the amount of revenue at stake, and the targeted domains of health care quality.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Quality of Health Care Delivered to Adults in the United StatesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- The Business Case For Quality: Case Studies And An AnalysisHealth Affairs, 2003
- Paying for Quality Improvement: Compliance with Tobacco Cessation GuidelinesThe Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Safety, 2003
- Why Is There A Quality Chasm?Health Affairs, 2002
- Health Plan Report Cards: Exploring Differences in Plan RatingsThe Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement, 1998
- Regulating the Behavior of Nursing Homes Through Positive Incentives: An Analysis of illinois' Quality Incentive Program (QUIP)The Gerontologist, 1991
- Physician response to fee changes with multiple payersJournal of Health Economics, 1991