Comparative Evaluation of the VITEK 2, Disk Diffusion, Etest, Broth Microdilution, and Agar Dilution Susceptibility Testing Methods for Colistin in Clinical Isolates, Including Heteroresistant Enterobacter cloacae and Acinetobacter baumannii Strains
- 1 October 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Vol. 51 (10) , 3726-3730
- https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.01406-06
Abstract
Increasing antibiotic resistance in gram-negative bacteria has recently renewed interest in colistin as a therapeutic option. The increasing use of colistin necessitates the availability of rapid and reliable methods for colistin susceptibility testing. We compared seven methods of colistin susceptibility testing (disk diffusion, agar dilution on Mueller-Hinton [MH] and Isosensitest agar, Etest on MH and Isosensitest agar, broth microdilution, and VITEK 2) on 102 clinical isolates collected from patient materials during a selective digestive decontamination or selective oral decontamination trial in an intensive-care unit. Disk diffusion is an unreliable method to measure susceptibility to colistin. High error rates and low levels of reproducibility were observed in the disk diffusion test. The colistin Etest, agar dilution, and the VITEK 2 showed a high level of agreement with the broth microdilution reference method. Heteroresistance for colistin was observed in six Enterobacter cloacae isolates and in one Acinetobacter baumannii isolate. This is the first report of heteroresistance to colistin in E. cloacae isolates. Resistance to colistin in these isolates seemed to be induced upon exposure to colistin rather than being caused by stable mutations. Heteroresistant isolates could be detected in the broth microdilution, agar dilution, Etest, or disk diffusion test. The VITEK 2 displayed low sensitivity in the detection of heteroresistant subpopulations of E. cloacae . The VITEK 2 colistin susceptibility test can therefore be considered to be a reliable tool to determine susceptibility to colistin in isolates of genera that are known not to exhibit resistant subpopulations. In isolates of genera known to (occasionally) exhibit heteroresistance, an alternative susceptibility testing method capable of detecting heteroresistance should be used.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of Etest, Vitek and agar dilution for susceptibility testing of colistinClinical Microbiology & Infection, 2007
- Comparison of Etest with agar dilution for testing the susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other multidrug-resistant bacteria to colistinJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2007
- Heteroresistance to Colistin in Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumanniiAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2006
- Comparison of three standardized disc susceptibility testing methods for colistinJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2006
- Colistin: The Revival of Polymyxins for the Management of Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsClinical Infectious Diseases, 2005
- Evaluation of colistin as an agent against multi-resistant Gram-negative bacteriaPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- In vitro susceptibility of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia isolates: comparison of disc diffusion, Etest and agar dilution methodsJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2004
- Comité de l'Antibiogramme de la Société Française de Microbiologie Report 2003,International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, 2003
- Evaluation of media available for testing the susceptibility of Pseudomonasaeruginosa by BSAC methodologyJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2002
- Polymyxin and Related Peptide AntibioticsAnnual Review of Biochemistry, 1977