The diagnostic value of IADL evaluation in the detection of dementia in general practice
- 1 January 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Aging & Mental Health
- Vol. 8 (1) , 52-57
- https://doi.org/10.1080/13607860310001613338
Abstract
It is assumed that general practitioners can make an important contribution to the diagnosis of dementia. One of the used strategies comprises an evaluation of the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL). There are contradictory data on the value of this strategy. During one month, 21 Flemish general practitioners evaluated the IADL capacities of all subjects older than 65 years with whom they had contact. Subjects with dementia and/or living in a residential home for the elderly were excluded. Housing and living conditions, medication use and IADL were registered. The general practitioner formulated a clinical evaluation. All subjects with an IADL score ≥ 1 and a random sample from the group IADL = 0 underwent a Mini Mental State Examination. Subjects with an IADL score = 4 were referred for neuropsychological and specialist examination. The average age of the 1003 registered subjects was 75.1 years (SD = 6.8). A large majority of them (85%) were totally independent. There was a large discrepancy between the family's and the patient's judgment on the presence of memory problems. There was an inverse correlation between the IADL and MMSE: when the IADL score increased, the MMSE score fell. The diagnostic value of the IADL for the diagnosis of dementia with Camdex-N as a reference standard could not be evaluated because the number of tested subjects was too small. Against the MMSE, sensitivity was 0.81 (SE = 0.03), and specificity was 0.48 (SE = 0.05). The evaluation of the IADL activities had some drawbacks as a detection method for dementia but the use of IADL data may still be clinically valuable in general practice. The correlation between the general practitioner's judgment and that of the specialist was very good. This study showed that the use of the IADL score might change the general practitioner's diagnostic judgment. Furthermore this study confirms the existence of a major threshold for the referral to a specialist of patients with suspected dementia by general practitioners.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Development and validation of the Observation List for early signs of Dementia (OLD)International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 2001
- Care of older people: Promoting health and function in an ageing populationBMJ, 2001
- The Appropriateness of Drug Use in an Older Nondemented and Demented PopulationJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2001
- Functional Impairment in Instrumental Activities of Daily Living: An Early Clinical Sign of Dementia?Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 1999
- The early diagnosis of dementia: triggers, early signs and luxating events.Family Practice, 1998
- THE ROLE OF GENERAL PRACTICE AND THE PRIMARY CARE TEAM IN DEMENTIA DIAGNOSIS AND MANAGEMENTInternational Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 1996
- How do General Practitioners Diagnose Dementia?Family Practice, 1994
- Four Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Score as a Predictor of One-year Incident DementiaAge and Ageing, 1993
- Instrumental Activities of Daily Living as a Screening Tool for Cognitive Impairment and Dementia in Elderly Community DwellersJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 1992
- “Mini-mental state”Journal of Psychiatric Research, 1975