Adoption of new health care services in Norway (1993–1997): specialists’ self-assessment according to national criteria for priority setting
- 1 April 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Health Policy
- Vol. 56 (1) , 65-79
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0168-8510(00)00135-4
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- The second phase of priority setting Goodbye to the simple solutions: the second phase of priority setting in health care Fairness as a problem of love and the heart: a clinician's perspective on priority setting Israel's basic basket of health services: the importance of being explicitly implicitBMJ, 1998
- The New Zealand priority criteria project. Part 1: OverviewBMJ, 1997
- Users' Guides to the Medical LiteratureJAMA, 1995
- Users' guides to the medical literature. IX. A method for grading health care recommendations. Evidence-Based Medicine Working GroupJAMA, 1995
- Clinical decision making: from theory to practice. Rationing resources while improving quality. How to get more for lessPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1994
- Clinical decision making: from theory to practice. Rationing by patient choicePublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1991
- Clinical decision making: from theory to practice. Designing a practice policy. Standards, guidelines, and optionsPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1990
- Clinical decision making: from theory to practice. Guidelines for policy statements: the explicit approachPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1990
- Clinical decision making: from theory to practice. Practice policies--guidelines for methodsJAMA, 1990
- Clinical decision making: from theory to practice. Practice policies --what are they?JAMA, 1990