A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Ekman and Ponar Grabs

Abstract
The effectiveness of 9 × 9 inch (23 cm) Ekman and Ponar grabs was compared at 26 stations in Green Bay; on hard (N = 8) and soft (N = 18) sediments. On hard sediments the Ponar caught significantly more midge larvae (99%), but not more oligochaete worms, than the Ekman. On soft sediments the Ekman caught significantly more midges (98%) and worms (95%) than the Ponar. Differences in effectiveness of the grabs are discussed in relation to their construction. The Ponar is heavier and bites more effectively into hard substrates. The Ekman probably creates less of a shock wave and can penetrate farther into soft sediments.

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: