Are Automated Blood Pressure Measurements Accurate in Trauma Patients?
- 1 November 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health
- Vol. 55 (5) , 860-863
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ta.0000092686.91877.de
Abstract
Background Automated blood pressure (BP) determinations by oscillometry are reported to be as accurate as invasive monitoring for systolic pressures as low as 80 mm Hg. Automated BP devices are widely used by prehospital providers and in hospital operating rooms, emergency departments, and intensive care units, although the accuracy of automated BP has not been demonstrated in trauma patients. We hypothesized that automated BP is less accurate than manual BP in trauma patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of automated BP versus manual BP in trauma patients. Methods A retrospective review of patients who met trauma activation criteria admitted to a Level I trauma center over a 30-month period was conducted. Patients were included if both manual BP and automated BP were measured within 5 minutes of admission. Additional data collected included Injury Severity Score, base deficit, and emergency department resuscitation volume. Statistical analysis was performed using paired t test, χ2, and linear regression analysis. Significance was attributed to a value of p < 0.05. Results From January 2000 through June 2002, 388 patients met inclusion criteria. Patients were grouped by manual BP levels: group 1, BP ≤ 90 mm Hg (n = 92); group 2, BP 91–110 mm Hg (n = 119); and group 3, BP ≥ 110 mm Hg (n = 177). The mean automated BP measurements were significantly higher than the manual measurements in groups 1 and 2 (26 and 16 mm Hg, respectively; p < 0.001). Of the 92 patients with manual BP ≤ 90, 45 (49%) had automated BP ≥ 100. The base deficit (−5, −3, and −2 for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively; p < 0.01), Injury Severity Score (30, 25, and 18; p < 0.01), and volume of resuscitative fluid and blood (p < 0.001) all decreased with higher BP group. Conclusion Injury severity, degree of acidosis, and resuscitation volume were more accurately reflected by manual BP. Automated BP determinations were consistently higher than manual BP, particularly in hypotensive patients. Automated BP devices should not be used for field or hospital triage decisions. Manual BP determinations should be used until systolic blood pressure is consistently ≥ 110 mm Hg.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Blood pressure monitoring: Automated oscillometric devicesJournal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 1991
- The use of automatic blood pressure monitors in the burned patientBritish Journal of Plastic Surgery, 1990
- A Revision of the Trauma ScorePublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1989
- Base Deficit as a Guide to Volume ResuscitationPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1988
- Oscillometry and direct blood pressure: A comparative clinical study during deliberate hypotensionCanadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, 1986
- Single cuff comparison of two methods for indirect measurement of arterial blood pressure: standard auscultatory method versus automatic oscillometric methodBasic Research in Cardiology, 1986
- Clinical comparison of automated auscultatory and oscillometric and catheter-transducer measurements of arterial pressureJournal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 1985
- Trauma scoreCritical Care Medicine, 1981
- Clinical evaluation of Dinamap 845 automated blood pressure recorder.Heart, 1980
- THE INJURY SEVERITY SCOREPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1974