Comparison of indirect probes of membrane potential utilized in studies of human neutrophils

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Four indirect probes of membrane potential, triphenylmethylphosphonium ion (TPMP+), 3,3′dipentyloxacarbocyanine [di‐O‐C5(3)], 3,3′ dipentylindocarbocyanine [di‐I‐C5(3)], and 3,3′ dipropylthiodicarbocyanine [di‐S‐C3(5)] have been used to study neutrophil (PMN) activation. The data extend previous studies indicating that the cyanine dye di‐S‐C3(5) not only exhibits a different fluorescence response mechanism from di‐O‐C5(3) [and di‐I‐C5(3)] but also that the fluorescence of di‐S‐C3(5) is destroyed by reactive oxygen products produced by neutrophils following stimulation. When these aspects of the probes are taken into account, the interpretations of the results using all three cyanine dyes are identical. Studies with the isotope TPMP+ indicate that long incubations are necessary for PMN to fully equilibrate during which time the PMNs depolarize. Use of TPB−, to shorten the TPMP+ equilibration time, produces results identical with those obtained using the cyanine dyes. The cyanine dyes and TPMP+/TPB− are toxic to neutrophil functions although they do not cause cell death. Toxicity can be avoided by using low concentrations of di‐O‐C5(3) and di‐I‐C5(3) but cannot be avoided with di‐S‐C3(5) or TPMP+/TPB−. Using di‐O‐C5(3) with the fluorescence‐activated cell sorter, we demonstrate that heterogeneity of neutrophil responsiveness confuses the interpretation of studies characterizing the ionic basis of the fluorescence responses stimulated by certain stimuli. We conclude that some of the discrepancies currently reported in the literature using these probes are not due to inherent differences in the ability of the different probes to monitor the same event (i.e., PMN membrane potential) but instead are due to failure to correct for probe‐specific problems or response heterogeneity.