Mitotic recombination counteracts the benefits of genetic segregation
- 13 March 2007
- journal article
- Published by The Royal Society in Proceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences
- Vol. 274 (1615) , 1301-1307
- https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2007.0056
Abstract
The ubiquity of sexual reproduction despite its cost has lead to an extensive body of research on the evolution and maintenance of sexual reproduction. Previous work has suggested that sexual reproduction can substantially speed up the rate of adaptation in diploid populations, because sexual populations are able to produce the fittest homozygous genotype by segregation and mating of heterozygous individuals. In contrast, asexual populations must wait for two rare mutational events, one producing a heterozygous carrier and the second converting a heterozygous to a homozygous carrier, before a beneficial mutation can become fixed. By avoiding this additional waiting time, it was shown that the benefits of segregation could overcome a twofold cost of sex. This previous result ignores mitotic recombination (MR), however. Here, we show that MR significantly hastens the spread of beneficial mutations in asexual populations. Indeed, given empirical data on MR, we find that adaptation in asexual populations proceeds as fast as that in sexual populations, especially when beneficial alleles are partially recessive. We conclude that asexual populations can gain most of the benefit of segregation through MR while avoiding the costs associated with sexual reproduction.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ameiotic recombination in asexual lineages of DaphniaProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2006
- Host‐Parasite Coevolution and Selection on Sex through the Effects of SegregationThe American Naturalist, 2006
- The prevalence and evolution of sex in microorganismsGenome, 2004
- The maintenance of sex in parasitesProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2003
- Resolving the paradox of sex and recombinationNature Reviews Genetics, 2002
- Do bacteria have sex?Nature Reviews Genetics, 2001
- Interindividual Variation in Mitotic RecombinationAmerican Journal of Human Genetics, 1999
- Why Sex and Recombination?Science, 1998
- Genetic segregation and the maintenance of sexual reproductionNature, 1989
- Rates of spontaneous mitotic recombination inSaccharomyces cerevisiaeGenetics Research, 1971