Comparison of protein phosphorylations in variant A431 cells with different growth responses to epidermal growth factor
- 31 May 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Cellular Physiology
- Vol. 119 (3) , 296-306
- https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.1041190307
Abstract
Growth of a selected variant of A431 cells (clone 29) is stimulated by epidermal growth factor (EGF) in contrast to the growth inhibition caused by EGF in an unselected clone, A4318. Twelve phosphoproteins from each clone were compared to determine whether unique EGF-dependent substrate phosphorylations might explain the cells' differing growth responses to EGF. Treatment of both clone 29 and A4318 cells with EGF increased phosphorylation of the EGF receptor/kinase and six cellular proteins identified on 2-dimensional poly-acrylamide gels. Four of these proteins (the EGF receptor/kinase and proteins of 36, 70, and 81 kd) contained phosphotyrosine in both clone 29 and A4318 cells, indicating that the same modification of several proteins occurred in cells which have totally different growth responses to EGF. Two proteins were identified whose phosphorylation was EGF dependent and which were unique to clone 29 cells; however, EGF increased phosphorylation of only serine residues in these proteins. This indicates that these proteins are not primary targets of the EGF-dependent tyrosine-specific protein kinase, but rather are substrates for serine-specific kinase(s) activated as a consequence of EGF:receptor interaction. cAMP, which inhibited growth of both clones, was utilized to compare the effects of EGF when the growth response of both cell lines was similar. In the presence of cAMP, EGF increased A4318 cellular phosphotyrosine content and the phosphorylation of the same phosphotyrosine-containing proteins of both clone 29 and A4318 cells. The in vivo activity of a second tyrosine-specific protein kinase, p60v-src in B77 Rous sarcoma virus (RSV)-transformed newborn rat kidney (NRK) cells, was also unaffected by cAMP. Thus cAMP did not block the in vivo activity of two tyrosine-specific kinases or the tyrosine phosphorylation of three specific protein substrates. A threshold model of tyrosine kinase activity is proposed as an alternative explanation for the differing growth responses to EGF.This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Analysis of morphology and receptor metabolism in clonal variant A431 cells with differing growth responses to epidermal growth factorJournal of Cellular Physiology, 1983
- Similar effects of platelet-derived growth factor and epidermal growth factor on the phosphorylation of tyrosine in cellular proteinsCell, 1982
- Synergistic stimulation of S6 ribosomal protein phosphorylation and DNA synthesis by epidermal growth factor and insulin in quiescent 3T3 cellsCell, 1982
- Role of epidermal growth factor‐stimulated protein kinase in control of proliferation of A431 cellsJournal of Cellular Biochemistry, 1982
- Reverse transformation of vole cells transformed by avian sarcoma virus containing the src geneJournal of Cellular Physiology, 1981
- Epidermal growth factor induces rapid tyrosine phosphorylation of proteins in A431 human tumor cellsCell, 1981
- Similarities and differences between the effects of epidermal growth factor and Rous sarcoma virus.The Journal of cell biology, 1981
- Two-dimensional gel analysis of cyclic amp effects in cultured s49 mouse lymphoma cells: Protein modifications, inductions and repressionsCell, 1979
- High resolution two-dimensional electrophoresis of basic as well as acidic proteinsCell, 1977
- Cleavage of Structural Proteins during the Assembly of the Head of Bacteriophage T4Nature, 1970