Abdominal vs. Perineal drainage in rectal surgery
- 1 May 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
- Vol. 30 (5) , 372-375
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02555457
Abstract
The efficiency of abdominal contra perineal drainage of the pelvic cavity after abdominoperineal resection for carcinoma of the rectum was evaluated retrospectively with regard to the frequency of perineal wound sepsis and length of hospital stay. Thirty-two (45 percent) of 71 patients with perineal drainage developed perineal wound sepsis, compared with four (12 percent) of 32 patients with abdominal drainage (P < 0.01). Patients with perineal drainage stayed longer in the hospital (mean, 33 days) than those with abdominal drainage (mean, 24 days) (P < 0.004). Furthermore, postoperative recovery was more comfortable in patients with abdominal drainage. Abdominal drainage therefore is recommended after abdominoperineal resection.This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pre- versus postoperative radiotherapy in rectal carcinoma: an interim report from a randomized multicentre trialBritish Journal of Surgery, 1985
- Preoperative Irradiation of Primarily Non-Resectable Adenocarcinoma of the Rectum and RectosigmoidActa Radiologica: Oncology, 1985
- Healing of the Perineal WoundArchives of Surgery, 1980
- Primary perineal closure after proctocolectomy for inflammatory bowel disease: Prevention of the persistent perineal sinusThe American Journal of Surgery, 1977
- A controlled clinical trial of three different methods of perineal wound management following excision of the rectumBritish Journal of Surgery, 1975
- Long-term complications and prognosis following major surgery for ulcerative colitisBritish Journal of Surgery, 1966
- A METHOD OF PERFORMING ABDOMINO-PERINEAL EXCISION FOR CARCINOMA OF THE RECTUM AND OF THE TERMINAL PORTION OF THE PELVIC COLON.The Lancet, 1908