Optimizing Defibrillation Through Improved Waveforms
- 1 March 1995
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
- Vol. 18 (3) , 526-538
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.1995.tb02563.x
Abstract
Defibrillation of the heart is achieved if an electrical current depolarizes the majority of the unsynchronized fibrillating myocardial cells. The applied current or the corresponding voltage described as a function of time is called the waveform. In pacing, to stimulate myocardial cells close to the electrode, a relatively low voltage is needed for a relatively brief duration. However, in defibrillation, approximately a 100-fold higher voltage is needed and achieved by the use of capacitors. The exponential voltage decay of a capacitor during its discharge determines the basic waveform for defibrillation. In an attempt to lower the energy needed for defibrillation, the steepness of the decay (different capacitances), the duration (fixed duration waveforms) or tilt (fixed tilt waveforms), or the initial polarity can be changed. Additionally, the polarity of the electrodes can be reversed during the discharge of the capacitor once (biphasic waveform) or twice (triphasic waveform). If two capacitors and defibrillation pathways are available, bidirectional defibrillation pulses can be delivered sequentially. In humans, the original standard waveform used with endocardial leads was a single monophasic pulse delivered by a 125-microF capacitor using the endocardial right ventricular electrode as cathode. It is now known that a reversal of the initial polarity and a reversal of polarity during capacitor discharge may significantly lower the energy needed for defibrillation, thereby preventing formerly frequent failures of defibrillation with endocardial lead systems. The use of sequential pulses showed no or only slight reductions of energy requirements and was abandoned due to the additional electrode needed. The use of a smaller capacitance (60-90 microF reduced maximum energy output but generally did not reduce energy requirements for defibrillation. However, with more efficient electrodes, smaller capacitances that will help to reduce the size of the defibrillator might be used. Thus, today defibrillation is optimized with respect to energy, capacitor size, and ease of implantation if an approximately 90-microF capacitor is used to deliver a biphasic pulse via a bipolar lead system using the right ventricular electrode as anode.Keywords
This publication has 68 references indexed in Scilit:
- Clinical efficacy of shock waveforms and lead configurations for defibrillationAmerican Heart Journal, 1994
- Endocardial pacing, cardioversion and defibrillation using a braided endocardial lead systemThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1993
- Comparison of biphasic and monophasic shocks for defibrillation using a nonthoracotomy systemThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1993
- Current Concepts for Selecting the Location, Size and Shape of Defibrillation ElectrodesPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1991
- Efficacy and safety of monophasic and biphasic waveform shocks using a braided endocardial defibrillation lead systemAmerican Heart Journal, 1990
- Superiority of biphasic shocks in the defibrillation of dogs by epicardial patches and catheter electrodesAmerican Heart Journal, 1989
- Improved internal defibrillation efficacy with a biphasic waveformAmerican Heart Journal, 1989
- Improved low energy defibrillation efficacy in man with the use of a biphasic truncated exponential waveformAmerican Heart Journal, 1989
- Improved internal defibrillation with twin pulse sequential energy delivery to different lead orientations in pigsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1985
- Termination of ventricular fibrillation in dogs by depolarizing a critical amount of myocardiumThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1975